Watt v. Amazon.com Services LLC
| Myles Watt |
| Amazon.com Services LLC |
| 2:2020cv01252 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE re: Proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order by Amazon.com Services LLC . (Waltman, Joshua) |
| Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Waltman, Joshua) |
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Telephonic Case Management Conference is set for 8/27/2020 at 8:45 a.m. (15 minutes allowed). Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call by arranging for the presence of all other attorneys and self-represented parties, and by calling chambers at the scheduled time. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 7/15/2020. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 7/15/2020. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER Any motions, responses or replies filed for which a courtesy copy is not delivered to the Court, as required, will be stricken and not considered. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 7/15/2020. (ESG)
|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Susan M Brnovich. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-20-1252-PHX-SMB. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 11 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Waltman, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE re: Service by Amazon.com Services LLC of Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge, Instructions, and Order of Recusal. (Waltman, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal by Amazon.com Services LLC.(Waltman, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. That this matter is reassigned to the Honorable Camille D. Bibles, United States Magistrate Judge. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-20-01252-PHX-CDB. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 6/29/20. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18413968. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T. Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: 2:20-cv-01252-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amazon.com Services LLC. (submitted by Joshua Waltman) (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-006090. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18413968 filed by Amazon.com Services LLC. (submitted by Joshua Waltman) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet) (REK) |
| ***State Court record received on 6/24/2020***SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Myles Watt: Proof of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Amazon.com Services Incorporated on 5/28/2020.***Proof of Service filed in State Court on 5/29/2020, docketed in U.S. District Court for case management purposes.*** (REK) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watt v. Amazon.com Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Myles Watt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Lee Waltman |
| Represented By: | Neil M Alexander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
