Scott v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff: Yvette Scott
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number: 2:2020cv01302
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2020 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against Boston Scientific Corporation filed by Yvette Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Amended Complaint)(Rivera, Jose)
August 13, 2020 Remark: Out of state attorney Joan Toomey removed as counsel of record for noncompliance with admissions procedure; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
August 4, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Elisha Calvin Biel on behalf of Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint (Doc. #12 ). The deadline for Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 9/4/2020. There will be no further extensions absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 7/28/2020. (RMW)
July 28, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pugel, Rachael)
July 21, 2020 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Pugel, Rachael)
July 21, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachael Marie Peters Pugel on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation. (Pugel, Rachael)
July 21, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sheila K Carmody on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation. (Carmody, Sheila)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 terminating #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Attorney notified to file pro hac vice into pro hac master case and pay $100 filing fee. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
July 20, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Wendy J. Wildung by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Wildung, Wendy)
July 20, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Wendy Jo Wildung on behalf of Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 14, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David C DeGreeff on behalf of Yvette Scott. (DeGreeff, David)
July 13, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Diane K Watkins on behalf of Plaintiff Yvette Scott. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 13, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for David C DeGreeff on behalf of Plaintiff Yvette Scott. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 1, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Boston Scientific Corporation. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
July 1, 2020 Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18433328. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T. Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01302-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Yvette Scott. (Rivera, Jose)(SCA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Yvette Scott. (SCA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18433328 filed by Yvette Scott.(Rivera, Jose) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Represented By: Rachael Marie Peters Pugel
Represented By: Elisha Calvin Biel
Represented By: Wendy Jo Wildung
Represented By: Sheila K Carmody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvette Scott
Represented By: Jeffrey M Kuntz
Represented By: Aaron Mathew Hall
Represented By: Jose de Jesus Rivera
Represented By: Joan D Toomey
Represented By: Diane K Watkins
Represented By: David C DeGreeff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?