Sacco v. APS Electric Company et al
| Gaetano N Sacco |
| Phoenix, City of and APS Electric Company |
| 2:2020cv01306 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (EJA) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER: When bringing an action, a plaintiff must either pay a filing fee of $350, plus an administrative fee of $50, or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees. If Plaintiff fails to submit the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (EJA) |
| Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01306-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (EJA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gaetano N Sacco. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(EJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
