Silversmith v. USA
Petitioner: Isaac Steven Silversmith
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2020cv01421
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Referring Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith James Hilzendeger on behalf of Isaac Steven Silversmith. (Hilzendeger, Keith)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Service Order (2255) - The Clerk of Court must electronically serve a copy of the Amended 2255 Motion (Doc. #5 ) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona. The Clerk of Court is further directed to provide a copy of this Order to Assistant Federal Public Defender Keith Hilzendeger via email. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the Amended 2255 Motion in the civil case. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/29/20. (Attachments: #1 2255)(EJA)
August 3, 2020 Filing 5 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Isaac Steven Silversmith. (SST) (10 pages)
July 22, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE re: Regarding Petitioner's Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by Isaac Steven Silversmith . (Hilzendeger, Keith)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - Movant's "Motion for Time Reduction by an Inmate in Federal Custody, (28 U.S.C. 2255)" (Doc. #1 in CV 20-01421-PHX-ROS (MHB)) is denied with leave to amend. Movant has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended motion in compliance with this Order. If Movant fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, terminate Document 128 in CR 12-00371-PHX-ROS and enter a judgment of dismissal of the civil action opened in connection with this 2255 action (CV 20-01421-PHX-ROS (MHB)), without prejudice, and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/21/20. (EJA)
July 17, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (HLA)
July 17, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (Davis or Residual Clause) under 28 U.S.C. 2255 re: Criminal Case No CR-12-371-PHX-ROS-MHB-1 filed by Isaac Steven Silversmith. (4 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silversmith v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Thomas C Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Isaac Steven Silversmith
Represented By: Keith James Hilzendeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?