Acuity v. Square Tree Framing LLC
| Acuity |
| Square Tree Framing LLC |
| 2:2020cv01428 |
| July 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff apply for entry of default or file a status report within seven days of the date of this Order concerning the status of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter will be dismissed without further notice if counsel fails to apply for entry of default or file a status report within seven days of the date of this Order. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/7/2020. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED re: #3 Summons Submitted, #1 Complaint (Service) upon Square Tree Framing LLC by Plaintiff Acuity. (Zdancewicz, Michael) *Modified to reflect correct event; attorney noticed on 10/7/2020 (SST). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on November 18, 2020. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/20/2020. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/20/2020. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Square Tree Framing LLC. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18487311. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01428-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Acuity. (Zdancewicz, Michael) (SCA) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Acuity. (SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18487311 filed by Acuity.(Zdancewicz, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Acuity v. Square Tree Framing LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Square Tree Framing LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Acuity | |
| Represented By: | Michael J Zdancewicz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
