Pilot Incorporated v. NOCO Company Incorporated
| Pilot Incorporated |
| NOCO Company Incorporated |
| 2:2020cv01452 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER: Supplemental Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. An answer, amended complaint, or other pleading #12 has been filed that may include additional trademarks, patents, or copyrights allegedly violated that were not previously included. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that may need to be completed by the party who filed the above document.If your recently filed pleading adds or changes information related to the original patents, trademarks, or copyright allegations, please complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms. Within seven (7) days, you must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form.If there are no changes to the copyright, trademark, or patent information previously submitted for this case, then the party who filed the above document must file a Notice, within seven (7) days, indicating such using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header (REK) |
Filing 14
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for October 29, 2020, at 10:45 a.m. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference will be telephonic. Counsel shall not appear in person. Counsel are directed to call (866) 390-1828; Access code 9667260 five minutes prior to the hearing. Counsel are advised that speaker phones are not permitted [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 9/24/20. (MAW)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by NOCO Company Incorporated. (Sixkiller, Laura) |
| Filing 12 DEFENDANT THE NOCO COMPANY INC.S ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand DEFENSES AND, COUNTERCLAIM TO PILOT, INC.S COMPLAINT against Pilot Incorporated by NOCO Company Incorporated.(Sixkiller, Laura) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The #10 Unopposed Motion to Extend Date to Respond to Complaint is granted. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants have until September 23, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 8/25/20. (GMP)
|
| Filing 10 *MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by NOCO Company Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sixkiller, Laura) *Modified to correct event and remove duplicative text on 8/25/2020 (GMP). |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NOCO Company Incorporated. (Sixkiller, Laura) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Alex W Ruge on behalf of Plaintiff Pilot Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Pilot Incorporated: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Corporate Disclosure Statement, Consent to Magistrate Judge, and Patent Report upon The NOCO Company Inc. on 08/03/2020. (Bradford, Aaron) |
| Remark: Out of state attorney Alex W Ruge removed as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Robert R Brunelli on behalf of Plaintiff Pilot Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Pilot Incorporated. (Bradford, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to NOCO Company Incorporated. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading (REK) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18500129. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R. Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01452-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pilot Incorporated. (submitted by Aaron Bradford) (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Pilot Incorporated. (submitted by Aaron Bradford) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18500129 filed by Pilot Incorporated. (submitted by Aaron Bradford) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pilot Incorporated v. NOCO Company Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NOCO Company Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Laura Elizabeth Sixkiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pilot Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Aaron P Bradford |
| Represented By: | Robert R Brunelli |
| Represented By: | Alex W Ruge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
