Baumbach v. Dennis et al
| Jonathan Baumbach |
| Charles L Ryan and David Dennis |
| 2:2020cv01481 |
| July 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| Camille D Bibles |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jonathan Baumbach, inmate #278913. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 9/4/2020. (WLP)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER (Service Packet)- IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #7 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $15.46. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. #10 ) is denied without prejudice. Defendant Dennis must answer the excessive force claim in Count One. Count Two, Count Three, and the portion of Count One premised on threats and verbal harassment are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Ryan is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. #1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Dennis. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 9/4/2020. (WLP)
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF FACTS in Support of #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Jonathan Baumbach. (SLQ) (35 pages). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jonathan Baumbach. (SLQ) (7 pages). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Jonathan Baumbach re: #8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, #7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (1 Page) (REK) |
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jonathan Baumbach. (3 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jonathan Baumbach. (2 Pages) (REK) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Plaintiffs' Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and six-month trust account statement using the form attached to this order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 7/29/20. (EJA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
| Filing 4 *NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) *Document did not NEF, refiled at Doc. #5 on 7/27/2020 (SST). |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jonathan Baumbach. (SST) (5 pages) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jonathan Baumbach. (SST) (2 pages) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Jonathan Baumbach. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SST) (18 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
