Chenault v. 2020 Central SPE LLC et al
Davonte Chenault |
2020 Central SPE LLC, Unknown Parties, DTZ Americas Incorporated a foreign corporation doing business as Cushman & Wakefield, Cushman & Wakefield US Incorporated a foreign corporation doing business as Cushman & Wakefield and Cassidy Turley Commercial Real Estate Services Incorporated a foreign corporation doing business as Cushman & Wakefield |
2:2020cv01482 |
July 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Liburdi |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal - Party Only filed by Davonte Chenault. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (GMP) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 2020 Central SPE LLC identifying Corporate Parent 2020 Central, SPE, LLC for 2020 Central SPE LLC. (Potts, David) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Certain Defendants Only (Doc. #6 ). Defendants Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc., DTZ Americas, Inc., and Cassidy Turley Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., are dismissed from this case, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because 2020 Central SPE LLC and fictitious defendants remain, the Clerk of the Court shall not close this case. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 8/24/2020. (RMW) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Party Dismissal by Davonte Chenault. Party DTZ Americas Incorporated (a foreign corporation), Cassidy Turley Commercial Real Estate Services Incorporated (a foreign corporation) and Cushman & Wakefield US Incorporated (a foreign corporation) terminated. (MacKinlay, James) |
Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by 2020 Central SPE LLC. (Potts, David) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by 2020 Central SPE LLC.(Potts, David) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to 2020 Central SPE LLC. (BAC) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18509816. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01482-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-007164. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18509816 filed by 2020 Central SPE LLC. (Potts, David) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibits to Notice of Removal)(BAC) |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Service of Process (Type of documents served not specified) upon C T Corporation System, Phoenix, AZ on 6/24/20.(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.