Murphy-Richardson v. Arizona, State of et al
| Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson, Ismael Murphy, Ismael A Richardson and Ismael Antonio Murphy Richardson |
| Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Attorney General, Florence, County of, Maricopa County Attorney's Office and Arizona Department of Corrections |
| 2:2020cv01493 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine (PS) |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #6 Order by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (LAD) (1 page) |
Filing 6
* ORDER - The July 31, 2020 Judgment (Doc. 4) is vacated. The Clerk of Court must re-open this case. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #5 ) is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended petition. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit a second amended petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/29/2020. (LAD) * Modified to clarify text on 9/30/2020 (LAD).
|
| Filing 5 ** CONSTRUED as an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissed without prejudice by #6 Order ** MOTION for Reconsideration re: #4 Clerks Judgment, #3 Order, MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (SST) (34 pages) Modified on 9/30/2020 (LAD). |
| Filing 4 ** VACATED BY #6 ORDER ** CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed July 31, 2020, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2254 and this action are hereby dismissed without prejudice. (LAD) Modified on 9/30/2020 (LAD). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - Petitioner's Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/31/2020. (LAD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LAD) (5 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
