Weston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Denise D Weston |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2020cv01543 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Denise D Weston: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (August 27, 2020); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (August 25, 2020); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (August 24, 2020) on August 27, 2020; August 25, 2020; August 24, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Domestic return receipts and certified mail receipts)(Caldwell, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Oscar Gonzalez appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY - Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's answering brief. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 8/5/2020. (LAD)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BAS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service of the summons and complaint. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 8/5/2020. (RMW)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-1543-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Denise D Weston. (Caldwell, Mark) (MCO) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Denise D Weston. (Caldwell, Mark) (MCO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Denise D Weston. (Caldwell, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Weston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Denise D Weston | |
| Represented By: | Mark Ross Caldwell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Oscar Gonzalez de Llano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
