Aguilera v. Barr et al
| Brandon Alexis Martinez Aguilera |
| Chad Wolf, William P Barr, John Ramirez, Albert Carter, Mario Ortiz and Kenneth T Cuccinelli |
| 2:2020cv01552 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Alien Detainee - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Elizabeth K. Sichi appearing for William P Barr, Albert Carter, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Mario Ortiz, John Ramirez, Chad Wolf. . (Sichi, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Brandon Alexis Martinez Aguilera. (Manzanarez, Juliana) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(MYE) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Brandon Alexis Martinez Aguilera. (Manzanarez, Juliana) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MYE) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-18539620 filed by Brandon Alexis Martinez Aguilera. (Manzanarez, Juliana) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit List, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
