Murillo v. Arizona, State of et al
Maxine Murillo |
Arizona, State of, Javier Chavez and Alfredo Reyes |
2:2020cv01580 |
August 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle (PS) |
John Z Boyle |
Steven P Logan |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal by Alfredo Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting DEF Motion for Extension of Time to Answer-RSP to PLF Complaint)(Staton, Georgia) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Georgia A Staton on behalf of Alfredo Reyes. (Staton, Georgia) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Stay CIVIL PROCEEDING PENDING RESOLUTION OF PARALLEL CRIMINAL CASE by Javier Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilenchik, Dennis) |
Filing 16 *WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Maxine Murillo. (Leader, John) *Modified to correct event and text on 9/29/2020 (REK). |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Joel B Robbins on behalf of Maxine Murillo. (Robbins, Joel) |
Filing 14 ORDER: The Motion #9 is granted as provided in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 9/18/2020. (REK) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Maxine Murillo. (Leader, John) |
Filing 12 *RESPONSE in Opposition re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Arizona, State of. (Lombino, Michelle) *Modified text on 9/2/2020 (REK). |
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which relief may be granted because the claims are barred by A. R. S. 12-820.05 (B) MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Counts One, Two, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten Defendant State's Motion to Dismiss and Certification of Conferral Pursuant to LRCiv 12.1(c) Defendant State's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Arizona, State of. (Lombino, Michelle) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #7 Response to Motion filed by Maxine Murillo, #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Maxine Murillo, #9 MOTION re: #4 Order (Doc. 4 Order (Re Service) filed by Maxine Murillo. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 9 *MOTION for Clarification re: #4 Order (Re Service) by Maxine Murillo. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Leader, John) *Modified text on 8/26/2020 (REK). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Maxine Murillo. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order (Proposed) Order for Remand)(Leader, John) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which relief may be granted because the claims are barred by A. R. S. 12-820.05 (B) MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Counts One, Two, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten Defendant State's Motion to Dismiss and Certification of Conferral Pursuant to LRCiv 12.1(c) filed by Maxine Murillo. (Leader, John) |
Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Maxine Murillo: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, First Amended Complaint, Cert re Arb Maricopa County Case CV2020-092821 upon Javier Chavez on 8/18/2020. (Leader, John) |
Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Maxine Murillo: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, First Amended Complaint, Cert re Arb Maricopa County Case CV2020-092821 upon Alfredo Reyes on 8/17/2020. (Leader, John) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff must, for any Defendant not yet served, either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the remove, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Plaintiff must answer the Motion to Dismiss within the time provided by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(c). Defendant may file a reply within the time provided by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(d). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 81(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/21/2020. (REK) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which relief may be granted because the claims are barred by A. R. S. 12-820.05 (B), MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Counts One, Two, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten Defendant State's Motion to Dismiss and Certification of Conferral Pursuant to LRCiv 12.1(c) by Arizona, State of. (Lombino, Michelle) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-092821. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18555992 filed by Arizona, State of. (Lombino, Michelle) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MCO) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Certificate Regarding Compulsory Arbitration/Civil Cover Sheet upon State of Arizona by Service Upon the Attorney General on Brian Munoz, Administrative Assist on 4/22/2020. (original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 4/28/2020.) (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint (original) with Jury Demand by Arizona, State of. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANANGEMENT PURPOSES*** (MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.