Tavares v. ASARCO LLC et al
Carrie Tavares |
Grupo Mexico SA de CV and ASARCO LLC |
2:2020cv01596 |
August 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by ASARCO LLC.(Mutz, Roscoe) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Cameron Jay Mitchell on behalf of Carrie Tavares. (Mitchell, Cameron) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting the parties' Stipulation #8 : Defendant ASARCO LLC shall have until September 25, 2020, to file an answer to the Complaint and otherwise respond as provided by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 9/8/2020. (LMR) |
Filing 9 *Corporate Disclosure Statement by ASARCO LLC identifying Corporate Parent ASARCO USA Incorporated, ASARCO Incorporated, Americas Mining Corporation, Grupo Mexico SAB de CV for ASARCO LLC. (Mutz, Roscoe) *Modified to add corporate parties on 9/9/2020 (EJA). |
Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by ASARCO LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mutz, Roscoe) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Carrie Tavares: Return of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Preliminary Order, and Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge upon ASARCO LLC on August 19, 2020. (Brown, Thomas) |
Filing 6 PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on November 10, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 8/13/2020. (LMR) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Carrie Tavares. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ASARCO LLC, Grupo Mexico SA de CV. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18563895. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01596-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Carrie Tavares. (submitted by Thomas Brown) (Attachments: #1 Summons) (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18563895 filed by Carrie Tavares. (submitted by Thomas Brown) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.