Gonzales v. Phoenix, City of
| Rosemarie Gonzales |
| Phoenix, City of |
| 2:2020cv01641 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. The parties shall submit their joint proposed case management plan not less than seven (7) days before the Scheduling Conference. (See attached Order for additional details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/2/2020. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Phoenix, City of. (Bhatheja, Anoop) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Phoenix, City of.(Bhatheja, Anoop) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 8/25/2020. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18589452. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01641-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-005153. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18589452 filed by Phoenix, City of. (submitted by Leslie Tuskai) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Cover Sheet) (REK) |
| ***State Court record received on 8/21/2020***SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Rosemarie Gonzales: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate Regarding Compulsory Arbitration, and Demand for Jury Trial upon City of Phoenix on 7/24/2020.***Affidavits of Service of Process filed in State Court on 7/27/2020, docketed in U.S. District Court on 8/21/2020 for case management purposes.*** (REK) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gonzales v. Phoenix, City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosemarie Gonzales | |
| Represented By: | Paige Constance Pataky |
| Represented By: | Michael J Petitti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Phoenix, City of | |
| Represented By: | Leslie Steve Tuskai |
| Represented By: | Anoop Bhatheja |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
