Dragonas v. Macerich
Bill Dragonas, Jr. |
Macerich |
2:2020cv01648 |
August 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Liburdi |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Strike #8 Reply Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Impermissible Surreply filed by Plaintiff in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Macerich. (Lawless, Laura) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Strike #8 Reply filed by Bill Dragonas, Jr. (SST) (4 pages) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #8 Reply by Macerich. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Strike Impermissible Surreply Filed by Plaintiff in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss)(Lawless, Laura) |
Filing 8 SUR-REPLY re: #7 Reply to Response to Motion by Plaintiff Bill Dragonas, Jr. (REK) |
Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of JurisdictionMOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Macerich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lawless, Laura) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bill Dragonas, Jr. (DXD) |
Filing 5 *MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Macerich. (Lawless, Laura). *Modified to correct event/ add motion part on 8/31/2020 (DXD). |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18591859. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T. Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01648-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Macerich. (submitted by Laura Lawless) (REK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dreamy Draw Justice Court (Maricopa County), case number CC2020110044RC. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18591859 filed by Macerich. (submitted by Laura Lawless) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dragonas v. Macerich | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Macerich | |
Represented By: | Melissa Legault |
Represented By: | Laura Lawless |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bill Dragonas, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.