Jacobs v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
| Erika Jacobs |
| Arizona Department of Economic Security |
| 2:2020cv01713 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Personal Injury: Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #9 Motion for Reconsideration for New Judge. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 10/21/2020. (ESG)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Arizona Department of Economic Security filed by Erika Jacobs.(LAD) (23 pages) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration for New Judge by Erika Jacobs. (LAD) (1 page) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #6 Motion for New Judge. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 9/30/2020. (ESG)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Service by the Court by Erika Jacobs. (LAD) (2 pages, styled as a letter, with waiver form attached). |
| Filing 6 MOTION for New Judge by Erika Jacobs. (LAD) (4 pages) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss this action without further order of this Court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects to file an Amended Complaint, it may not be served until and unless the Court issues an Order screening the Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 9/16/2020. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the #2 Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, withoutprepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore is granted. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 9/03/2020. (ESG)
|
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01713-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (LAD) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION (Motion and Affidavit) for Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Erika Jacobs. (LAD) (7 pages) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Erika Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(LAD) (23 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jacobs v. Arizona Department of Economic Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erika Jacobs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arizona Department of Economic Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
