Wojichowski v. Nikola Corporation et al
John J Wojichowski |
Kim J Brady, Mark A Russell, Nikola Corporation and Trevor Milton |
2:2020cv01819 |
September 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Douglas L Rayes |
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Peter J Linken, Bradley J Bondi on behalf of Defendant Trevor Milton. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Asheesh Goel on behalf of Defendants Kim J Brady, Nikola Corporation, Mark A Russell. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Jeremy A Fielding on behalf of Defendants Kim J Brady, Nikola Corporation, Mark A Russell. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 8 ORDER - pursuant to the parties' #7 stipulation, Defendants shall not be required to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint or any amended complaint until a briefing schedule is entered. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants have not waived and expressly preserve all arguments and defenses. Signed by Judge Douglas L. Rayes on 10/14/20. (NKS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Gabor Balassa, Whitney L Becker on behalf of Defendants Kim J Brady, Nikola Corporation, Mark A Russell. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Kim J Brady, Nikola Corporation, Mark A Russell. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Gilson, Thomas) |
Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by John J Wojichowski: Proof of Service re: Complaint upon Nikola Corporation on 9/22/2020. (Gotto, Gary) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Stephen John Teti, Jeffrey Craig Block, Jacob A Walker on behalf of Plaintiff John J Wojichowski. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/17/2020. (RMV) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kim J Brady, Trevor Milton, Nikola Corporation, Mark A Russell. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18676651. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01819-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by John J Wojichowski. (submitted by Gary Gotto) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18676651 filed by John J Wojichowski. (submitted by Gary Gotto) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.