Barber v. Peoria, City of et al
Anthony Barber |
Peoria, City of, Stephen Smith and Arthur Miller |
2:2020cv01904 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
Susan R Bolton |
Eileen S Willett |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Anthony Barber: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 11/05/2020 to City of Peoria, Artuhr Miller, Stephen Smith . (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service - Chief Miller, #2 Waiver of Service - Officer Smith)(Rundall, Benjamin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE re: Notice of Filing of Non-e-Filed Exhibit to Complaint by Anthony Barber re: #1 Complaint . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Rundall, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion for Leave of Court for Non- Electronic Filing of Exhibit (Doc. #6 ). Plaintiff may file the video exhibit pursuant to the policies and procedures of the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/29/20. (SLQ) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Non-Electronic Exhibit by Anthony Barber. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Permitting Non-Electronic Filing of Exhibit)(Rundall, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SST). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. This matter is assigned to the standard track and referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Document #2 . Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/16/20. (SST) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Anthony Barber. (submitted by Benjamin Rundall) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (REK) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18725941 filed by Anthony Barber. (submitted by Benjamin Rundall) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.