Patterson v. Shinn et al
Petitioner: Isiah Patterson
Respondent: David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle and Stephen Morris
Case Number: 2:2020cv02068
Filed: October 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Anthony Curtisi on behalf of Stephen Morris, David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle. (Curtisi, Nathan)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Dale A Baich on behalf of Isiah Patterson. (Baich, Dale)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #3 ) is GRANTED. Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona, is appointed as Counsel for Petitioner in this federal habeas corpus proceeding. Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. The designated Assistant Federal Public Defender shall file a notice of appearance or substitution with the Court within ten (10) days from receipt of this Order. The Arizona Attorney General shall file a notice of appearance with the Court within ten (10) days from receipt of this Order. The Clerk of Court send a copy of this Order either electronically or through postal mail to Lacey Stover Gard, Assistant Arizona Attorney General and to Petitioner. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/29/2020. (WLP)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MAP)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Isiah Patterson. (MAP)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Isiah Patterson. (MAP)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 STATEMENT of Intent by Petitioner Isiah Patterson. (MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Shinn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Shinn
Represented By: Nathan Anthony Curtisi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeff Van Winkle
Represented By: Nathan Anthony Curtisi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stephen Morris
Represented By: Nathan Anthony Curtisi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Isiah Patterson
Represented By: Kush M Govani
Represented By: Scott Wisniewski
Represented By: Dale A Baich
Represented By: Jon M Sands
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?