Ramirez v. Glendale, City of et al
| Tony Ramirez |
| Glendale, City of and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2020cv02092 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Nancy Ann Mangone. (Mangone, Nancy) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Two through Six filed by Glendale, City of. (Schepler, Aaron) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply. Defendant shall file a Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #3 ) on or before 12/4/20. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 11/30/20. (DXD)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Two through Six by Glendale, City of. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Schepler, Aaron) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Two through Six of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Tony Ramirez. (Ortega, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Motion #7 is granted. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #3 on or before November 23, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 11/20/2020. (REK)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Tony Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Ortega, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #5 Notice of Attorney Appearance/Substitution. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Please correct future pleadings. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION: Daniel R. Ortega Jr. appearing for Tony Ramirez. Attorney Julio Medina Zapata terminated. . (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order re Notice of Substitution of Counsel)(Ortega, Daniel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and is assigned to the standard track. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/5/20. (DXD)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Counts/Claims : Two through Six by Glendale, City of. (Schepler, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL rom Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2020-093074. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18826258 filed by Glendale, City of. (submitted by Aaron Schepler) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Cover Sheet) (REK) |
| ***State Court record received on 10/29/2020***SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Tony Ramirez: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon City of Glendale on 9/29/2020.***Certificate of Service filed in State Court on 10/02/2020, docketed in U.S. District Court on 10/29/2020 for case management purposes.*** (REK) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
