McConico #218605 v. Shaw
| Lamont McConico |
| Unknown Shaw |
| 2:2020cv02093 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Michael T Morrissey |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER (Service Packet): Defendant Shaw must answer the First Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff this Order, and a copy of the Marshal's Process Receipt & Return form (USM-285) and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for Defendant Shaw. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 12/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Service Packet Letter, #2 Service Packet Forms) (REK)
|
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Unknown Shaw filed by Lamont McConico. (LAD) (8 pages, marked as an Original Complaint) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Lamont McConico. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/16/2020. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Form)(LAD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (LAD) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lamont McConico. (LAD) (3 pages) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lamont McConico. (LAD) (2 pages) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Lamont McConico. (LAD) (5 pages. Note: Signature page is not included). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McConico #218605 v. Shaw | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamont McConico | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown Shaw | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
