Wheatley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Dora Wheatley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2020cv02137
Filed: November 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Inseon Jeong appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Jeong, In)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 terminating #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
November 9, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney David B. Goetz by Dora Wheatley. (Goetz, David)
November 9, 2020 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for David B Goetz on behalf of Plaintiff Dora Wheatley. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's brief. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 11/6/2020. (LAD)
November 6, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BAS)
November 6, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX223786. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M. Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-02137-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
November 6, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Dora Wheatley. (BAS)
November 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX223786 filed by Dora Wheatley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wheatley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: In Seon Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dora Wheatley
Represented By: David B Goetz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?