Leto v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Michael R Leto
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2020cv02180
Filed: November 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Federal Tax Suits: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Filing 8 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Michael R Leto: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons, Complaint, Order upon U.S. Department of Justice on 11/23/2020 and U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona on 11/20/20. (Kaczmarek, Derek) *Modified text on 12/4/2020 (REK).
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Errata re: #1 Complaint Exhibit A to Complaint by Plaintiff Michael R Leto.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint)(Vaporean, Paul)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant (s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on February 12, 2021, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/13/20. (MAW)
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Michael R Leto. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK)
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America via U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (REK)
November 13, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18875875. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-02180-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
November 13, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael R Leto. (submitted by Derek Kaczmarek) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REK)
November 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18875875 filed by Michael R Leto. (submitted by Derek Kaczmarek) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leto v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael R Leto
Represented By: Derek W Kaczmarek
Represented By: Paul Joseph Vaporean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?