Booth.com Limited v. SmartWallet.com et al
| Booth.com Limited company and Booth.com Limited |
| LE Holdings LLC and SmartWallet.com |
| 2:2020cv02404 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on March 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 12/15/2020. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 12/15/2020. (ESG)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Any motions, responses or replies filed for which a courtesy copy is not delivered to the Court, as required, will be stricken and not considered.. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 12/15/2020. (ESG)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to LE Holdings LLC. (SST). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading (SST) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18969349. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-02404-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SST) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Booth.com Limited company. (Submitted by David Gingras) (SST) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Booth.com Limited company. (Submitted by David Gingras) (SST) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-18969349 filed by Booth.com Limited company. (Submitted by David Gingras) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
