Greene v. M.A.G. Construction Incorporated
Lu Beth Greene |
M.A.G. Construction Incorporated |
2:2020mc00041 |
August 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Opening Regarding: Registration of Foreign Judgments - 28 U.S.C. 1963. Case Opening Fee Received: $47.00 receipt number 0970-18606608 filed by Lu Beth Greene. (submitted by Samuel Dampt) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Greene v. M.A.G. Construction Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lu Beth Greene | |
Represented By: | Samuel G Dampt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: M.A.G. Construction Incorporated | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.