Younan v. Shinn, et. al.
| Stewart Edward Younan |
| Unknown Romo, David Shinn and Unknown Pyle |
| 2:2021cv00029 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed January 12, 2021, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to use the court-approved form complaint with 30 days leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 1/12/21. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT (Emergency Injunction for Order) filed by Stewart Edward Younan (4 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
