Griffith et al v. Paran LLP
Plaintiff: Detrick Curtis Conerly and Michael Griffith
Defendant: Paran LLP
Case Number: 2:2021cv00124
Filed: January 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Referring Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed March 18, 2021, judgment is hereby entered and this case is dismissed without prejudice. (SST)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #5 ) is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must close the case and enter judgment. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 3/18/21. (SST)
March 1, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Detrick Curtis Conerly. (SST) (2 pages)
February 16, 2021 Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Michael Griffith. Reason for return: Return to Sender: Attempted - Not Known - Unable to Forward. Document number 3. (REK)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiff Michael Griffith is dismissed. The Clerk of Court must send a courtesy copy of this Order to Michael Griffith at the address listed in the docket. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff Conerly must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff Conerly fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff Conerly a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/5/21. (SST)
January 22, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST)
January 22, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Detrick Curtis Conerly. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SST) (25 pages, titled "Motion for Full Faith and Credit Pursuant 28 USC 1738")

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffith et al v. Paran LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Detrick Curtis Conerly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paran LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?