Humphrey et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
Plaintiff: William Humphrey and Dion Humphrey
Defendant: Unknown Parties and Phoenix, City of
Case Number: 2:2021cv00150
Filed: January 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles
Referring Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that the scheduling conference set for March 23, 2021 in CV-21-00150-PHX-SMB(CDB) is vacated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all further pleadings must be docketed only in the earliest case, i.e., in CV-20-02350-PHX-SMB(CDB). Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 3/02/2021. (REK)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting the 16 Joint Stipulation (Motion) to Consolidate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED consolidating Case Number CV-20-02350-PHX-SMB (CDB) and Case Number CV 21-00150-PHX-SMB (CDB). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these cases shall be consolidated under Case No. CV-02350-PHX-SMB (CDB) for all further purposes, including trial. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 3/1/2021. (Associated Cases: 2:20-cv-02350-SMB-CDB, 2:21-cv-00150-SMB-CDB) (LAD)
February 26, 2021 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Dion Humphrey, William Humphrey, Dion Humphrey, William Humphrey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Associated Cases: CV-20-02350-PHX-SMB-CDB,CV-21-00150-SMB-CDB) (Dow, David)
February 25, 2021 Filing 9 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Consolidate by Dion Humphrey, William Humphrey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Dow, David)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 3/23/2021 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 2/04/2021. (REK)
February 4, 2021 Filing 7 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Phoenix, City of. (Graffious, Derek)
February 4, 2021 Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Phoenix, City of.(Graffious, Derek)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - (1) Defendant City of Phoenix must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 81(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (2) This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). (3) This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 2/2/2021. (LAD)
February 1, 2021 Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA)
January 29, 2021 Filing 3 P*LAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Dion Humphrey, William Humphrey. (Dow, David) *Modified to add additional filer on 2/1/2021 (REK).
January 28, 2021 Filing 2 Amended by Doc. #4 - NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SCA) Modified on 2/1/2021 (NKS).
January 28, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-000252. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19105016 filed by Phoenix, City of. (Graffious, Derek) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(SCA)
January 28, 2021 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial, Certificate of Compulsary Arbitration upon Connie Haesloop, Special Deputy to the Clerk on 01/08/2021. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 01/13/2021) (SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Humphrey et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix, City of
Represented By: John T Masterson
Represented By: Derek Ryan Graffious
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Humphrey
Represented By: David W Dow
Represented By: Jennifer Lauren Ghidotti
Represented By: Benjamin Paul Taylor, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dion Humphrey
Represented By: David W Dow
Represented By: Jennifer Lauren Ghidotti
Represented By: Benjamin Paul Taylor, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?