Harvey v. Ducey et al
| Joshua Miles Harvey |
| Patricia Starr, Mark Brnovich, Doug Ducey, David Shinn and Amanda Jacinto |
| 2:2021cv00218 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Michael T Morrissey |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Petitioner's "Final Order" (Doc. #9 ), to the extent that it seeks any relief, is denied. Petitioner has 30 days from the filing date of this Order to (1) pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and (2) file an amended petition using the court-approved form. If Petitioner fails to pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/31/21. (SST)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Proof of Claim by Joshua Miles Harvey. (SST) (6 pages, titled "Final Order") |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Clerk of Court must update Petitioner's address of record to ASPC-Winslow, Kaibab Unit, 2100 S Highway 87, Winslow, AZ 86047 and list his ADC inmate number as 27900. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2254 petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Petitioner's "Petition for Instant Hearing" (Doc. #2 ) is denied. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Non-Death Penalty)" and the current court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/12/21. (SST)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MHW) |
| Filing 6 Letter Rogatory by Joshua Miles Harvey. (3 pages) (MHW) |
| Filing 5 Praecipe to the Clerk of Court by Joshua Miles Harvey. (5 pages) (MHW) |
| Filing 4 Unlimited Subrogation Bond by Joshua Miles Harvey. (2 pages) (MHW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Hearing by Joshua Miles Harvey. (15 pages) (MHW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Hearing (document titled Petition for Instant Hearing) by Joshua Miles Harvey. (3 pages) (MHW) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Joshua Miles Harvey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-DD, #2 Exhibits AAA-M, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Envelope 1, #5 Envelope 2, #6 Envelope 3)(154 pages)(MHW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
