Winters v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Tanya Winters |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2021cv00225 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's order filed March 9, 2021, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (REK) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment #6 , Motion Seeking Disability Benefits #7 , and Motion Seeking Eligible Workers Disability #9 are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 3/18/2021. (LMR)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION (Seeking Eligible Workers Disability) by Tanya Winters. (SST) (2 pages) |
| Filing 8 MOTION Seeking Both Social Security Cases be Joined by Tanya Winters. (SST) (1 page) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Seeking Disability Benefits by Tanya Winters. (SST) (1 page) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment, or MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Tanya Winters. (REK) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 is granted. The Complaint #1 is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Order no later than April 7, 2021. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, the amended complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens it pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). If Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint by April 7, 2021, the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order of this Court. See order for additional details. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 3/8/2021. (LMR)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00225-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Tanya Winters. (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tanya Winters. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Winters v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tanya Winters | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
