Malles v. Shepherd et al
Dustin James Malles |
Justin Solberg, Gila, County of, J Adam Shepherd, Penni Padgett and Paul Penzone |
2:2021cv00251 |
February 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Michelle H Burns (PS) |
Roslyn O Silver |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Penni Padgett, Paul Penzone, J Adam Shepherd, Justin Solberg filed by Dustin James Malles. (6 pages)(WLP) |
Filing 7 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The First Amended Complaint (Doc. #4 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/17/2021. (WLP) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number PHX227049. (WLP) |
Filing 5 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/11/2021. (WLP) |
Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Penni Padgett, J Adam Shepherd, Justin Solberg, Paul Penzone filed by Dustin James Malles. (8 pages) (WLP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
Filing 1 ORDER: This case is severed into individual actions, one for each named Plaintiff. The Clerk shall assign a new case number to each new individual action and file a copy of the Complaint and this Order in each new case. The rulings in this Order shall apply in each new case. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, each Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice with 30 days leave to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. The Clerk shall use the Gila County Jail address as the mailing address for each Plaintiff when mailing a copy of this Order and the case- opening paperwork in the new actions. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/16/2021. (REK) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Dustin James Malles. (68 Pages and Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.