Nadhar et al v. Renaud
| Sreenadh Kareti, Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam, Kautilya Vemulapalli, Hendrik Lund, Nazanin Niakan, Uma Saimani, Karien Wilson and Ali Al Sharifi |
| Tracy Renaud |
| 2:2021cv00275 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: The Court having reviewed Defendant's #11 Motion to Extend the time to Answer or otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs' #13 response in opposition, and no good cause appearing; IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's #11 Motion to Extend. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/12/2021. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE in Opposition re: #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Ali Al Sharifi, Sreenadh Kareti, Hendrik Lund, Maria Robien Nadhar, Nazanin Niakan, Athul Radhakrishnan, Uma Saimani, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam, Kautilya Vemulapalli, Karien Wilson. (Banias, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendant's #11 Motion to Extend the Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by no later than 4/9/2021. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/6/2021. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 11
*First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by Tracy Renaud. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sichi, Elizabeth) *Modified to correct motion type and add document link on 4/6/2021 (REK).
|
|
Filing 10
*NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Ali Al Sharifi, Sreenadh Kareti, Hendrik Lund, Maria Robien Nadhar, Nazanin Niakan, Athul Radhakrishnan, Uma Saimani, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam, Kautilya Vemulapalli, Karien Wilson . (Attachments: #1 Redlined Amended Complaint)(Banias, Bradley) *Modified to reflect document filed with incorrect case number on 3/15/2021 (MFR).
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #7 Amended Complaint filed by Karien Wilson, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam, Uma Saimani, Nazanin Niakan, Kautilya Vemulapalli, Sreenadh Kareti, Hendrik Lund, Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Ali Al Sharifi. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 15.1(b) - The amending party must file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please use event Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b)) and attach a copy of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text that was deleted and underlining the text that was added. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: AUSA Elizabeth K. Sichi appearing for Tracy Renaud. . (Sichi, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tracy Renaud filed by Vijay Keerthi Seetharam, Sreenadh Kareti, Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Hendrik Lund, Nazanin Niakan, Kautilya Vemulapalli, Karien Wilson, Uma Saimani, Ali Al Sharifi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Banias, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 6
SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Sreenadh Kareti, Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon United States Attorneys Office for the District of Arizona on 2/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Receipt)(Banias, Bradley)
|
|
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Matthew Tony Galati on behalf of Plaintiffs Sreenadh Kareti, Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/12/2021. (RMV)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Tracy Renaud. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
|
|
Filing 3
Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19157771. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-275-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Submitted by Sreenadh Kareti, Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam.(Banias, Bradley) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19157771 filed by Athul Radhakrishnan, Maria Robien Nadhar, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam, Sreenadh Kareti.(Banias, Bradley) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(JAM)
|
|
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Bradley Bruce Banias on behalf of Plaintiffs Maria Robien Nadhar, Athul Radhakrishnan, Vijay Keerthi Seetharam. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
