C.R. Bard Incorporated v. Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff: C.R. Bard Incorporated
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv00284
Filed: February 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Referring Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Tanck on behalf of Atrium Medical Corporation. (Tanck, Paul)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge David G Campbell. All further leadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-21-284-PHX-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by C.R. Bard Incorporated. (Gale, Jessica)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Paul Tanck on behalf of Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the Stipulated Motion (Doc. #10 ), IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Atrium Medical Corp. to answer or respond to the February 16, 2021 complaint of Plaintiff C.R. Bard, Inc. is extended to April 23, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 3/8/21. (SST)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by Atrium Medical Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McArdle, Christopher)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Atrium Medical Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Gentinge AB, Other Affiliate Datascope Corp., Other Affiliate Gentinge Holding USA, Inc. for Atrium Medical Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(McArdle, Christopher)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Louis McArdle on behalf of Atrium Medical Corporation. (McArdle, Christopher)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Gregory Joseph Carbo on behalf of Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Wade Geoffrey Perrin on behalf of Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Christopher Louis McArdle on behalf of Defendant Atrium Medical Corporation. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by C.R. Bard Incorporated: Certificate of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Atrium Medical Corporation on February 18, 2021. (Federhar, Andrew)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Atrium Medical Corporation. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19163040. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-284-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. (ARC)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by C.R. Bard Incorporated. (Federhar, Andrew) (ARC)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19163040 filed by C.R. Bard Incorporated. (Federhar, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C.R. Bard Incorporated v. Atrium Medical Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation
Represented By: Christopher Louis McArdle
Represented By: Paul Tanck
Represented By: Gregory Joseph Carbo
Represented By: Wade Geoffrey Perrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C.R. Bard Incorporated
Represented By: Jessica Anne Gale
Represented By: Andrew Mark Federhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?