Robinson v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kimberly Robinson
Defendant: Unknown Parties and QuikTrip Corporation a foreign corporation doing business as QuikTrip Store #454
Case Number: 2:2021cv00293
Filed: February 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Telephonic Case Management Conference is set for April 26, 2021, at 10:30 a.m. in courtroom 304, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151. (See Order for details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 3/26/21. (SST)
March 24, 2021 Filing 10 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. FURTHER ORDERED the Order to Show Cause deadline is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 24, 2021 Filing 9 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - That Defendant QuikTrip Corporation shall show cause in writing on or before April 8, 2021, why Defendant should not be sanctioned or be held in contempt of court pursuant to title 18 U.S.C. 401 for failing to comply Rule 3.7(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If Defendant complies with Rule 3.7(b) on or before April 8, 2021, by either consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction or electing to have the case assigned to a District Judge, the undersigned will automatically vacate this Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 3/24/21. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
March 2, 2021 Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
February 18, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by QuikTrip Corporation. (Julian, Theodore)
February 17, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to QuikTrip Corporation. (SCA)
February 17, 2021 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19170169. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M. Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00293-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (SCA)
February 17, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-000506. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19170169 filed by QuikTrip Corporation.(Julian, Theodore) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(SCA)
February 17, 2021 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Process upon QuikTrip Corporation on 01/19/2021.(Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 01/22/2021) (SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.
February 17, 2021 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** ANSWER to Amended Complaint by QuikTrip Corporation. (Original answer to amended complaint filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 02/02/2021)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation a foreign corporation doing business as QuikTrip Store #454
Represented By: Theodore A Julian, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Robinson
Represented By: Daniel Scott Brill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?