Malaby v. Shinn et al
Mace Allen Malaby |
David Shinn and Allistair Adelle |
2:2021cv00403 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Camille D Bibles (PS) |
Dominic W Lanza |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER - Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/31/2021. (LAD) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX226924. (LAD) |
Disc (one) - This was received with the case-initiating documents and it will be stored in the Phoenix file room. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NKS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Mace Allen Malaby. (Part 1) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Envelope)(LAD) (119 pages. Note: A paper copy of a disk is at Exhibit C, part 6). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.