CoreCivic of Tennessee v. International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America
Petitioner: CoreCivic of Tennessee
Respondent: International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America, and its Local 825, Local 825 International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America and International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America
Case Number: 2:2021cv00410
Filed: March 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Matthew J Clark on behalf of Respondents International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America, Local 825 International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Nicholas J Enoch appearing for Local 825 International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America. And attorneys Matthew J. Clark, Bruce C. Jackson and Clara S. Acosta. (Enoch, Nicholas)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by CoreCivic of Tennessee: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 03/11/2021 to Local 825, International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America . (Struck, Daniel)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by CoreCivic of Tennessee, International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 03/11/2021 to International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America . (Struck, Daniel)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for David Roger Anderson, Mark Hazen Floyd on behalf of Petitioner CoreCivic of Tennessee. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America, Local 825 and International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MYE). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19241548. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-410-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by CoreCivic of Tennessee. (Struck, Daniel) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MYE)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CoreCivic of Tennessee. (Struck, Daniel) (MYE)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION and MOTION to Vacate Arbitrator's Award Under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19241548 filed by CoreCivic of Tennessee. (Struck, Daniel) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-F to Petition and Motion to Vacate)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CoreCivic of Tennessee v. International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CoreCivic of Tennessee
Represented By: Jamie Dennise Guzman
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Represented By: David Roger Anderson
Represented By: Mark Hazen Floyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America, and its Local 825
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Local 825 International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America
Represented By: Matthew J Clark
Represented By: Bruce Campbell Jackson, Jr.
Represented By: Nicholas Jason Enoch
Represented By: Clara Stephanie Acosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America
Represented By: Matthew J Clark
Represented By: Bruce Campbell Jackson, Jr.
Represented By: Nicholas Jason Enoch
Represented By: Clara Stephanie Acosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?