Borecki v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: Henryk S Borecki
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and Arizona Department of Transportation
Case Number: 2:2021cv00415
Filed: March 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Filing 8 USCA Case Number re: #7 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. Case number 21-15572, Ninth Circuit. (LAD)
March 29, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #6 Order by Henryk S Borecki. (2 Pages) (REK)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has permission to file an amended complaint by 4/12/2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, the amended complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). If Plaintiff is given leave to serve an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall be responsible for service of the summons and complaint. Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 3/22/2021. (RMW)
March 11, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK)
March 10, 2021 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T. Liburdi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00415-PHX-MTL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
March 10, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Henryk S Borecki. (REK)
March 10, 2021 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Henryk S Borecki. (REK)
March 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Henryk S Borecki. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borecki v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henryk S Borecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Transportation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?