King v Nationwide Recovery Service Incorporated
Plaintiff: Amanda King
Defendant: Nationwide Recorvery Service Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2021cv00430
Filed: March 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 *ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Conference is set for 6/29/2021 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P. Logan. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 5/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(LMR) *Modified to correct signature date on 5/10/2021 (REK).
May 6, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Nationwide Recorvery Service Incorporated.(Gregory, John)
April 15, 2021 Filing 6 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Amanda King: Return of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Nationwide Recovery Service Incorporated via Ashley Green on 4/14/2021. (Kent, Trinette) *Modified text on 4/16/2021 (REK).
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRELIMINARY ORDER that a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motion to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on June 10, 2021, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P. Logan on 3/16/2021. (LMR)
March 12, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nationwide Recorvery Service Incorporated. (REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
March 12, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19248769. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00430-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM)
March 12, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Amanda King.(Kent, Trinette) (REM)
March 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19248769 filed by Amanda King.(Kent, Trinette) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v Nationwide Recovery Service Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide Recorvery Service Incorporated
Represented By: John Michael Gregory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda King
Represented By: Trinette G Kent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?