Brown v. Garland
Petitioner: Paul Barrington Brown
Respondent: Merrick B Garland
Case Number: 2:2021cv00459
Filed: March 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Benjamin F Aiken on behalf of Petitioner Paul Barrington Brown. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
April 7, 2021 Filing 41 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 6, 2021 Filing 40 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 5, 2021 Filing 38 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 22, 2021 Filing 36 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Nancy K. Canter appearing for Merrick B Garland. . (Canter, Nancy)
March 11, 2021 Filing 35 On 3/11/21, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 20-72500 was received in this district. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00459-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form) (DXD)
March 11, 2021 Filing 34 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #33 Case Transferred In - District Transfer by Petitioner Paul Barrington Brown. (Attachments: #1 9CCA Doc 20, #2 9CCA Doc 21, #3 9CCA Doc 23) (DXD)
March 11, 2021 Filing 33 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; Case Number 20-72500. Original file with documents numbered 1, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received filed by Paul Barrington Brown. (Attachments: #1 9CCA Docket Sheet, #2 9CCA Doc 1, #3 9CCA Doc 7, #4 9CCA Doc 10, #5 9CCA Doc 11, #6 9CCA Doc 12, #7 9CCA Doc 14, #8 9CCA Doc 15 Part 1, #9 9CCA Doc 15 Part 2, #10 9CCA Doc 16) (DXD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick B Garland
Represented By: Rebekah Nahas
Represented By: Nancy Canter
Represented By: Anthony C Payne
Represented By: Anthony Messuri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul Barrington Brown
Represented By: Jennifer Joan Axel
Represented By: Benjamin Aiken
Represented By: Brian Philip Goldman
Represented By: Benjamin F Aiken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?