Pittman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Derrick Pittman |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2021cv00463 |
| March 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Derrick Pittman: Notice of Service re: Summons upon William Barr, US Attorney General (4/23/2021); Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (4/12/2021); Michael Bailey, US Attorney for the District of Arizona (4/12/2021) on 4/23/2021; 4/12/2021; 4/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Larkin, Robin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Carol Clark appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Clark, Carol) |
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on June 17, 2021. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/1/2021. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 7
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. See attached Order. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/1/2021. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(LAD) (3 total) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and may serve the Summons and Complaint by waiver under Rule 4(d). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/1/2021. (LAD)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-00463-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Derrick Pittman.(Larkin, Robin) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REM) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Derrick Pittman.(Larkin, Robin) (REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Derrick Pittman.(Larkin, Robin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pittman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Carol Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derrick Pittman | |
| Represented By: | Robin Michelle Larkin |
| Represented By: | Sarah Nicole Fern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
