Moss #43775 v. Shinn et al
| Edward Paul Moss |
| David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2021cv00497 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 21, 2021, judgment of dismissal is entered. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed. (MHW) |
Filing 4
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis Void Judgment (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 04/21/2021. (MHW)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (LAD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (LAD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Error Coram Nobis Void Judgment filed by Edward Paul Moss. (LAD) (20 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
