Sagy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Todd Patrick Sagy |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2021cv00565 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Todd Patrick Sagy: Return of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Scheduling Order upon U.S. Attorney's Office on 4/24/2021, Office of Regional Counsel on 4/26/2021, and Attorney General on 4/29/2021. (Vidrine, Dustin) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(LAD) (3 total) |
Filing 7
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the application (Doc. #2 ) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/7/2021. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 6
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER - Within sixty (60) days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendant's brief. (See document for further details). Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/7/2021. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on 7/2/2021. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/7/2021. (KFZ)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-565-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Todd Patrick Sagy. (Vidrine, Dustin) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ARC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Todd Patrick Sagy. (Vidrine, Dustin) (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Todd Patrick Sagy. (Vidrine, Dustin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sagy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Todd Patrick Sagy | |
| Represented By: | Dustin Paul Vidrine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
