Scott v. Albertson's Incorporated et al
| Gene Edward Scott, II |
| Megellan Behavioral Health, Tolleson Police Department, Unknown Parties, Phoenix Police Department, Unknown Collins, Graciel Garcia, Unknown Party and Albertson's Incorporated |
| 2:2021cv00579 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed May 7, 2021, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss to the extent Plaintiff seeks dismissal of this case without prejudice and denying as moot #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/6/21. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Case Without Fault by Gene Edward Scott, II. (DXD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SST) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gene Edward Scott, II. (SST) (5 pages) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Gene Edward Scott, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (SST) (7 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
