Alsaud #108844 v. Shinn et al
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud |
Melvin Willis, David Shinn, Adam Henry and Unknown Herman |
2:2021cv00636 |
April 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
James F Metcalf (PS) |
Steven P Logan |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed May 6, 2021, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (MHW) |
Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's "Motion: Preliminary Injunction Ramadhan Saum Denial Practing [sic] [First] Amendment Rights" (Doc. #1 ) is denied and this action is dismissed. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 05/06/2021. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 IFP)(MHW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MHW) |
Filing 2 *NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (MHW) *Modified file date from 4/16/21 to 4/13/21 on 4/16/2021 (CEI). |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT (titled Motion:Prelimary Injunction Ramadman Saum Denial Practing 1st Amendment Rights) filed by Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud. (3 pages)(MHW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.