Allison v. Shinn et al
Robert Owen Allison |
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2021cv00647 |
April 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
James A Teilborg |
Eileen S Willett |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Casey Douglas Ball on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, David Shinn. (Ball, Casey) |
Filing 7 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 06/03/21. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
Filing 6 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254) - The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney Generals Office. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, copies of the Petition and this Order will be sent via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the State of Arizona Respondent through the Attorney General for the State of Arizona to designated electronic mail addresses. Within 2 business days, the Attorney General's Office will acknowledge receipt of the Petition and the Courts Order and within 5 business days will either file a notice of appearance on behalf of Respondents or will notify the Court of the names of the Respondents on whose behalf the Arizona Attorney Generals Office will not accept service of process. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Respondents must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(WLP) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PHX228370. (MHW) |
Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee. If Petitioner fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 04/23/2021. (MHW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MHW) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Robert Owen Allison. (2 pages) (MHW) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Robert Owen Allison. ( 69 pages) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Envelope)(MHW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.