Neibarger-Turer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Ellen Neibarger-Turer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2021cv00720
Filed: April 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2021 Filing 8 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 30, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Bryan Konoski on behalf of Plaintiff Ellen Neibarger-Turer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP)
April 26, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Ellen Neibarger-Turer. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM)
April 26, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Ellen Neibarger-Turer. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(1). No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM)
April 26, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
April 26, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19394877. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-720-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. (JAM)
April 26, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ellen Neibarger-Turer. (Konoski, Bryan) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM)
April 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19394877 filed by Ellen Neibarger-Turer. (Konoski, Bryan) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neibarger-Turer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ellen Neibarger-Turer
Represented By: Bryan Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?