Finnegan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Jeanne Finnegan |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv00746 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 8/16/2021 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 606, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/27/2021. (RMV)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Toppel, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Toppel, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - This Court is participating in a Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for employment cases alleging adverse action, initiated by the Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/29/2021. (RMV)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/28/2021. (RMV)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (JAM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19406301. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-746-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Jeanne Finnegan. (Kresin, David) (JAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19406301 filed by Jeanne Finnegan. (Kresin, David) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Finnegan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | James Alexander Dattilo |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey W Toppel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeanne Finnegan | |
| Represented By: | David Charles Kresin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
