Cleveland v. Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC
Plaintiff: Danielle Cleveland
Defendant: Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv00884
Filed: May 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Danielle Cleveland: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 05/27/2021 to Concrete Construction Services of Arizona, L.L.C . (Hunt, Marshall)
May 21, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Courtney Lowery, Josh Sanford on behalf of Plaintiff Danielle Cleveland. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on 8/16/2021. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/18/2021. (ESG)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/18/2021. (ESG)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Any motions, responses or replies filed for which a courtesy copy is not delivered to the Court, as required, will be stricken and not considered. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 5/18/2021. (ESG)
May 18, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
May 18, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19479546. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-884-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC)
May 18, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Danielle Cleveland. (Hunt, Marshall) (ARC)
May 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19479546 filed by Danielle Cleveland. (Hunt, Marshall) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cleveland v. Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Concrete Construction Services of Arizona LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Cleveland
Represented By: Marshall Ray Hunt
Represented By: Josh Sanford
Represented By: Courtney Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?