Banuelos et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
Maya Ramos, Garrett Thomas, Austin Barbini and Brandon Banuelos |
Phoenix, City of and Jeri Williams |
2:2021cv00957 |
June 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle (PS) |
John Z Boyle |
Diane J Humetewa |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiffs must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiffs do not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 6/10/21. (SST) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19522928 filed by Brandon Banuelos, Austin Barbini, Maya Ramos, Garrett Thomas. (Benedetto, Stephen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.