Neal v. Experian Information Solutions Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Ursula Neal
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing Incorporated and Experian Information Solutions Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2021cv01099
Filed: June 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Anthony Patrick Chester on behalf of Plaintiff Ursula Neal. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 20, 2021 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Thomas Everett Irons on behalf of Plaintiff Ursula Neal. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. ORDERED that Plaintiff serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/6/2021. (LFIG)
June 24, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions Incorporated, Select Portfolio Servicing Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
June 24, 2021 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19601586. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-1099-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
June 24, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ursula Neal. (McBride, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MCO)
June 24, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19601586 filed by Ursula Neal. (McBride, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neal v. Experian Information Solutions Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ursula Neal
Represented By: Ryan Lee McBride
Represented By: David James McGlothlin
Represented By: Anthony Patrick Chester
Represented By: Thomas Everett Irons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?